55 research outputs found

    A Test for the Stability of Networks

    Get PDF
    A complex polynomial is called a Hurwitz polynomial, if all its roots have a real part smaller than zero. This kind of polynomial plays an all-dominant role in stability checks of electrical (analog or digital) networks. In this article we prove that a polynomial p can be shown to be Hurwitz by checking whether the rational function e(p)/o(p) can be realized as a reactance of one port, that is as an electrical impedance or admittance consisting of inductors and capacitors. Here e(p) and o(p) denote the even and the odd part of p [25].Rowinska-Schwarzweller Agnieszka - Chair of Display Technology University of Stuttgart Allmandring 3b, 70596 Stuttgart, GermanySchwarzweller Christoph - Institute of Computer Science University of Gdansk Wita Stwosza 57, 80-952 Gdansk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek. The ordinal numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1):91-96, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. Binary operations. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1):175-180, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. The complex numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 1(3):507-513, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. Functions and their basic properties. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1): 55-65, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. Functions from a set to a set. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1):153-164, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. Partial functions. Formalized Mathematics, 1(2):357-367, 1990.Czesław Bylinski. Some basic properties of sets. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1):47-53, 1990.Andrzej Kondracki. Basic properties of rational numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 1(5): 841-845, 1990.Eugeniusz Kusak, Wojciech Leonczuk, and Michał Muzalewski. Abelian groups, fields and vector spaces. Formalized Mathematics, 1(2):335-342, 1990.Anna Justyna Milewska. The field of complex numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2): 265-269, 2001.Robert Milewski. The ring of polynomials. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2):339-346, 2001.Robert Milewski. The evaluation of polynomials. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2):391-395, 2001.Robert Milewski. Fundamental theorem of algebra. Formalized Mathematics, 9(3):461-470, 2001.Michał Muzalewski and Wojciech Skaba. From loops to abelian multiplicative groups with zero. Formalized Mathematics, 1(5):833-840, 1990.Jan Popiołek. Real normed space. Formalized Mathematics, 2(1):111-115, 1991.Piotr Rudnicki and Andrzej Trybulec. Abian’s fixed point theorem. Formalized Mathematics, 6(3):335-338, 1997.Piotr Rudnicki and Andrzej Trybulec. Multivariate polynomials with arbitrary number of variables. Formalized Mathematics, 9(1):95-110, 2001.Christoph Schwarzweller. Introduction to rational functions. Formalized Mathematics, 20 (2):181-191, 2012. doi:10.2478/v10037-012-0021-1.Christoph Schwarzweller and Agnieszka Rowinska-Schwarzweller. Schur’s theorem on the stability of networks. Formalized Mathematics, 14(4):135-142, 2006. doi:10.2478/v10037-006-0017-9.Andrzej Trybulec and Czesław Bylinski. Some properties of real numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 1(3):445-449, 1990.Michał J. Trybulec. Integers. Formalized Mathematics, 1(3):501-505, 1990.Wojciech A. Trybulec. Groups. Formalized Mathematics, 1(5):821-827, 1990.Wojciech A. Trybulec. Vectors in real linear space. Formalized Mathematics, 1(2):291-296, 1990.Zinaida Trybulec. Properties of subsets. Formalized Mathematics, 1(1):67-71, 1990.Rolf Unbehauen. Netzwerk- und Filtersynthese: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Oldenbourg-Verlag, fourth edition, 1993.Edmund Woronowicz. Relations and their basic properties. Formalized Mathematics, 1 (1):73-83, 1990.Hiroshi Yamazaki and Yasunari Shidama. Algebra of vector functions. Formalized Mathematics, 3(2):171-175, 1992

    On Monomorphisms and Subfields

    Get PDF
    This is the second part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [2], [1] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [5], [3], [4].In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ [X]/ as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/.Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in this second part the field (E \ ϕF )∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ : F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅.Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitray fields F : With the exception of 2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of n, and we have n ∩ n[X] = ∅, ∩ [X] = ∅ and ∩ [X] = ∅, respectively.In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives - for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ - a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.Institute of Informatics, University of Gdańsk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pąk. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, and Adam Naumowicz. Four decades of Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 55(3):191–198, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10817-015-9345-1.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Heinz Lüneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, Körper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.27213313

    On Roots of Polynomials over F[X]/ 〈p〉

    Get PDF
    This is the first part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [1], [2] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [9], [4], [6].In this first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ [X]/ as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ(p) has a root over F [X]/.Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in the second part the field (E \ ϕF )∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ : F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E =∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F \ F [X] =∅.Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitray fields F : With the exception of 2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of n, and we have n ∩ n[X] = ∅, ∩ [X] = ∅and ∩ [X] = ∅, respectively.In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F i F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ : F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives - for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ - a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.Institute of Informatics, University of Gdańsk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pąk, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261–279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20615-8_17.Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pąk. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, and Christoph Schwarzweller. On algebraic hierarchies in mathematical repository of Mizar. In M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, and M. Paprzycki, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), volume 8 of Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, pages 363–371, 2016. doi:10.15439/2016F520.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Artur Korniłowicz and Christoph Schwarzweller. The first isomorphism theorem and other properties of rings. Formalized Mathematics, 22(4):291–301, 2014. doi:10.2478/forma-2014-0029.Heinz Lüneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, Körper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Robert Milewski. The evaluation of polynomials. Formalized Mathematics, 9(2):391–395, 2001.Robert Milewski. Fundamental theorem of algebra. Formalized Mathematics, 9(3):461–470, 2001.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.Christoph Schwarzweller. The binomial theorem for algebraic structures. Formalized Mathematics, 9(3):559–564, 2001.2729310

    Some Algebraic Properties of Polynomial Rings

    Get PDF
    In this article we extend the algebraic theory of polynomial rings, formalized in Mizar [1], based on [2], [3]. After introducing constant and monic polynomials we present the canonical embedding of R into R[X] and deal with both unit and irreducible elements. We also define polynomial GCDs and show that for fields F and irreducible polynomials p the field F[X]/ is isomorphic to the field of polynomials with degree smaller than the one of p.Schwarzweller Christoph - Institute of Computer Science University of Gdansk, PolandKorniłowicz Artur - Institute of Informatics University of Białystok, PolandRowinska-Schwarzweller Agnieszka - Sopot PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Bylinski, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pak, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261-279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1.H. Heuser. Lehrbuch der Analysis. B.G. Teubner Stuttgart, 1990.Steven H. Weintraub. Galois Theory. Springer Verlag, 2 edition, 2009

    Ring and Field Adjunctions, Algebraic Elements and Minimal Polynomials

    Get PDF
    In [6], [7] we presented a formalization of Kronecker’s construction of a field extension of a field F in which a given polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root [4], [5], [3]. As a consequence for every field F and every polynomial there exists a field extension E of F in which p splits into linear factors. It is well-known that one gets the smallest such field extension – the splitting field of p – by adjoining the roots of p to F. In this article we start the Mizar formalization [1], [2] towards splitting fields: we define ring and field adjunctions, algebraic elements and minimal polynomials and prove a number of facts necessary to develop the theory of splitting fields, in particular that for an algebraic element a over F a basis of the vector space F (a) over F is given by a0, . . ., an−1, where n is the degree of the minimal polynomial of a over F .Institute of Informatics, University of Gdansk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pąk, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261–279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20615-8_17.Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pąk. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Heinz Lüneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, Körper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.Christoph Schwarzweller. Renamings and a condition-free formalization of Kronecker’s construction. Formalized Mathematics, 28(2):129–135, 2020. doi:10.2478/forma-2020-0012.Christoph Schwarzweller. Representation matters: An unexpected property of polynomial rings and its consequences for formalizing abstract field theory. In M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, and M. Paprzycki, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, volume 15 of Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, pages 67–72. IEEE, 2018. doi:10.15439/2018F88.Yasushige Watase. Algebraic numbers. Formalized Mathematics, 24(4):291–299, 2016. doi:10.1515/forma-2016-0025.28325126

    Renamings and a Condition-free Formalization of Kronecker’s Construction

    Get PDF
    In [7], [9], [10] we presented a formalization of Kronecker’s construction of a field extension E for a field F in which a given polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root [5], [6], [3]. A drawback of our formalization was that it works only for polynomial-disjoint fields, that is for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. The main purpose of Kronecker’s construction is that by induction one gets a field extension of F in which p splits into linear factors. For our formalization this means that the constructed field extension E again has to be polynomial-disjoint.Institute of Informatics, University of Gdansk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pąk, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261–279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20615-8_17.Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pąk. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Artur Korniłowicz. Quotient rings. Formalized Mathematics, 13(4):573–576, 2005.Heinz Lüneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, Körper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.Christoph Schwarzweller. On roots of polynomials over F [X]/ 〈 p〉. Formalized Mathematics, 27(2):93–100, 2019. doi:10.2478/forma-2019-0010.Christoph Schwarzweller. On monomorphisms and subfields. Formalized Mathematics, 27(2):133–137, 2019. doi:10.2478/forma-2019-0014.Christoph Schwarzweller. Field extensions and Kronecker’s construction. Formalized Mathematics, 27(3):229–235, 2019. doi:10.2478/forma-2019-0022.Christoph Schwarzweller. Representation matters: An unexpected property of polynomial rings and its consequences for formalizing abstract field theory. In M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, and M. Paprzycki, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, volume 15 of Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, pages 67–72. IEEE, 2018. doi:10.15439/2018F88.28212913

    Quadratic Extensions

    Get PDF
    In this article we further develop field theory [6], [7], [12] in Mizar [1], [2], [3]: we deal with quadratic polynomials and quadratic extensions [5], [4]. First we introduce quadratic polynomials, their discriminants and prove the midnight formula. Then we show that - in case the discriminant of p being non square - adjoining a root of p’s discriminant results in a splitting field of p. Finally we prove that these are the only field extensions of degree 2, e.g. that an extension E of F is quadratic if and only if there is a non square Element a ∈ F such that E and F(√a) are isomorphic over F.Christoph Schwarzweller - Institute of Informatics, University of Gdańsk, PolandAgnieszka Rowińska-Schwarzweller - Sopot, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pąk, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261–279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20615-8 17.Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Byliński, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pąk. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, and Christoph Schwarzweller. On algebraic hierarchies in mathematical repository of Mizar. In M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, and M. Paprzycki, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), volume 8 of Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, pages 363–371, 2016. doi:10.15439/2016F520.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Serge Lang. Algebra. Springer Verlag, 2002 (Revised Third Edition).Heinz Luneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, K¨orper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.Christoph Schwarzweller. Ring and field adjunctions, algebraic elements and minimal polynomials. Formalized Mathematics, 28(3):251–261, 2020. doi:10.2478/forma-2020-0022.Christoph Schwarzweller. Formally real fields. Formalized Mathematics, 25(4):249–259, 2017. doi:10.1515/forma-2017-0024.Christoph Schwarzweller. On roots of polynomials and algebraically closed fields. Formalized Mathematics, 25(3):185–195, 2017. doi:10.1515/forma-2017-0018.Christoph Schwarzweller and Artur Korniłowicz. Characteristic of rings. Prime fields. Formalized Mathematics, 23(4):333–349, 2015. doi:10.1515/forma-2015-0027.Steven H. Weintraub. Galois Theory. Springer-Verlag, 2 edition, 2009.29422924

    On the Intersection of Fields F with F[X]

    Get PDF
    This is the third part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [1], [2] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [6], [4], [5]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ F [X]/ as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ . Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in the second part the field (E \ ϕF)∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ: F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in this third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitrary fields F : With the exception of ℤ2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of ℤn, ℚ and ℝ we have ℤn ∩ ℤn[X] = ∅, ℚ ∩ ℚ[X] = ∅ and ℝ ∩ ℝ[X] = ∅, respectively. In the fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives – for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ – a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.Institute of Informatics, University of Gdansk, PolandGrzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Bylinski, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, Karol Pak, and Josef Urban. Mizar: State-of-the-art and beyond. In Manfred Kerber, Jacques Carette, Cezary Kaliszyk, Florian Rabe, and Volker Sorge, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, volume 9150 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261–279. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 978-3-319-20614-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20615-8 17.Grzegorz Bancerek, Czesław Bylinski, Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, Roman Matuszewski, Adam Naumowicz, and Karol Pak. The role of the Mizar Mathematical Library for interactive proof development in Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 61(1):9–32, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10817-017-9440-6.Adam Grabowski, Artur Korniłowicz, and Christoph Schwarzweller. On algebraic hierarchies in mathematical repository of Mizar. In M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, and M. Paprzycki, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), volume 8 of Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, pages 363–371, 2016. doi:10.15439/2016F520.Nathan Jacobson. Basic Algebra I. Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985.Heinz Lüneburg. Gruppen, Ringe, Körper: Die grundlegenden Strukturen der Algebra. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.Knut Radbruch. Algebra I. Lecture Notes, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1991.27322322
    corecore